IRONICA: IRON Repletion In Heart Failure - A Comparison of Oral and IV Approaches
Part of paid clinical trials in Bowling Green, Kentucky.
- Sponsor
- Syed Hamza Mufarrih
- Study ID
- NCT07053475
- Phase
- PHASE4
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF)
- Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)
- Iron Deficiency
- Iron-deficiency Anemia (IDA)
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 100 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Ferric Carboxymaltose — DRUGIntravenous infusion of 1 gram FCM during index hospital stay, followed by a second dose at Week 6 (1,000 mg if \> 70 kg or 500 mg if ≤ 70 kg).
- Ferrous Sulfate — DRUGOral administration of one 150 mg capsule every 48 hours for 12 weeks.
Study Details
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which iron treatment works better for adults with congestive heart failure and low iron levels: intravenous (IV) iron given through a vein or oral (PO) iron taken by mouth. Participants must have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and a transferrin-saturation (TSAT) level below 20 percent. The main questions the study will answer are: 1. Does IV iron raise walking distance on a 6-minute walk test more than oral iron after 24 weeks? 2. Does IV iron improve symptoms and quality of life more than oral iron? 3. How do the two treatments compare for safety, side effects, and hospital readmissions/ mortality? Researchers will compare IV ferric carboxymaltose with oral ferrous sulfate to see which option helps people feel and function better. What participants will do * Be randomly assigned by (like flipping a coin) to IV iron or oral iron. * Receive either a one-time IV iron infusion (with possible repeat at 12 weeks) or take iron pills twice each day for 24 weeks. * Visit the infusion clinic at 6 weeks for second dose of IV iron if needed. * Visit the clinic at 12 weeks for a follow-up to gather follow-up data including 1. A 6-minute walk test 2. Brief symptom and quality-of-life surveys 3. Blood tests to measure serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation This study will help doctors decide whether IV or oral iron is the safer, more effective way to treat iron deficiency in people with heart failure in our local community.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Apr 2, 2025
- Status verified
- Jun 2025
- Primary completion
- Dec 31, 2026
- Completion
- Mar 31, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: IV Iron (Ferric Carboxymaltose)Patients randomized to receive intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. Dosing includes a 1-gram IV infusion during the index hospital stay, followed by a second infusion at Week 6 (1,000 mg if \> 70 kg or 500 mg if ≤ 70 kg).
- Active Comparator: Oral Iron (Ferrous Sulfate)Patients randomized to receive one capsule of oral ferrous sulfate (Ferrex 150 mg) every 48 hours for 12 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure
Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ]
Central Contacts
- Syed H Mufarrih, MD304-598-4218
- Melinda Joyce(270) 535-6879
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Medical Center | Bowling Green | Kentucky | 42101 |
Find similar trials in Bowling Green, KY
Related Studies
- Product Performance Report: Evaluate Long-term Reliability & Performance of Medtronic Marketed Cardiac Therapy ProductsRecruiting · Medtronic · Birmingham, Alabama
- Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Profile of Understudied Drugs Administered to Children Per Standard of Care (POPS)Recruiting · Duke University · Phoenix, Arizona
- Assessment of CCM in HF With Higher Ejection FractionRecruiting · Impulse Dynamics · Birmingham, Alabama
- Ultrafiltration Versus IV Diuretics in Worsening Heart FailureRecruiting · Nuwellis, Inc. · Tucson, Arizona