Telerehabilitation for Aphasia (TERRA)
Part of paid clinical trials in Columbia, South Carolina.
- Sponsor
- University of South Carolina
- Study ID
- NCT04682223
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Aphasia
- Stroke
- Stroke Rehabilitation
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 21 Years - 80 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Semantically-focused therapy tasks — BEHAVIORAL1\) Semantic feature analysis (SFA; Boyle \& Coelho, 1995; Boyle, 2004). For each pictured stimulus the participant is prompted to name the picture. Then, s/he is encouraged to produce semantically related words that represent features similar to the target word. 2) Semantic barrier task. This approach includes features of the Promoting Aphasics' Communication Effectiveness (PACE; Davis \& Wilcox,1985). The goal of the task is for one participant (e.g., person with aphasia) to describe each card so that the other participant (e.g., clinician) can guess the picture on the card. 3) Verb network strengthening therapy (VNeST; Edmonds et al., 2009; 2014) targets lexical retrieval of verbs and their thematic nouns. The objective of VNeST is for the participant to generate verb-noun associates with the purpose of strengthening the connections between the verb and its thematic roles.
- Phonologically-focused therapy tasks — BEHAVIORAL1\) Phonological components analysis task (PCA; Leonard et al., 2008). The participant first attempts to name a given picture and then to identify the phonological features of the target words. 2) Phonological production task focuses on the identification of phonological features of targeted, imageable nouns and verbs. It requires the participant to sort picture stimuli based on the number of syllables and then to identify a hierarchy of phonological features. Once each targeted feature is identified for the pair of words, the participant is required to blend the syllables/sounds together. 3) Phonological judgment task relies on computerized presentation of verbs and nouns where participants are required to judge whether pairs of words include similar phonological features (e.g. # of syllables, initial phonemes, final phonemes, rhyming).
Study Details
Speech-language therapy is generally found to be helpful in the rehabilitation of aphasia. However, not all patients with aphasia have access to adequate treatment to maximize their recovery. The goal of this project is to compare the efficacy of telerehabilitation or Aphasia Remote Therapy (ART) to the more traditional In-Clinic Therapy (I-CT).
Key Dates
- Start date
- May 5, 2021
- Status verified
- Mar 2026
- Primary completion
- Jan 31, 2027
- Completion
- Mar 31, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: Aphasia Remote Therapy (ART)All participants in this group will receive 3 weeks of daily semantically-focused treatment (semantic feature analysis, semantic barrier task and verb network strengthening therapy) and 3 weeks of daily phonologically-focused treatment (phonological components analysis, phonological production task, phonological judgment task). Participants will be randomized to order of treatment. All treatment will be done remotely with a speech-language pathologist through an online platform using therapy applications. Participants will be provided with teletherapy kits (including an Internet hotspot if needed) to complete the therapy tasks.
- Active Comparator: In-Clinic Therapy (I-CT)All participants in this group will receive 3 weeks of daily semantically-focused treatment (semantic feature analysis, semantic barrier task and verb network strengthening therapy) and 3 weeks of daily phonologically-focused treatment (phonological components analysis, phonological production task, phonological judgment task). Participants will be randomized to order of treatment. All treatment will be done in person with a speech-language pathologist at the UofSC Aphasia Lab.
Primary Outcome Measure
Speech Production Outcome Score (SPOTS) [ Time Frame: Compare baseline score to 6 month follow-up (after treatment) score. ]
Central Contacts
- Sara Sayers, M.S.803-777-2693
- Kelli Powell, B.S.803-777-5051
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of South Carolina Aphasia Lab | Columbia | South Carolina | 29201 | Julius Fridriksson, Ph.D (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Columbia, SC
By condition
By specialty
By research site
Related Studies
- GORE® CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder and Antiplatelet Medical Management for Reduction of Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): the REDUCE Post Approval StudyRecruiting · W.L.Gore & Associates · Tucson, Arizona
- Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute AphasiaPHASE2 · Recruiting · Johns Hopkins University · Baltimore, Maryland
- Neural Bases of Vocal Sensorimotor Impairment in AphasiaRecruiting · The University of Texas at Dallas · Irvine, California
- Exercise Primed Stroke RehabilitationEARLY_PHASE1 · Recruiting · VA Office of Research and Development · Charleston, South Carolina