Trial results for a study on Colorectal Cancer screening strategies were posted on 2025-09-04. The study investigated different approaches to increase screening completion, with the combined inreach and outreach strategy yielding 132 completed screenings.
Background
Colorectal cancer remains a significant public health concern, with early detection through screening being crucial for improved patient outcomes. Despite established screening guidelines, participation rates can vary. This context highlights the importance of identifying effective strategies to enhance screening completion, thereby potentially reducing the incidence and mortality associated with colorectal cancer.
Trial design
This completed study, which did not specify a phase (NA), enrolled 673 participants to evaluate strategies for increasing colorectal cancer screening. The study focused on Colorectal Cancer and aimed to determine if inreach and outreach strategies, alone or in combination, would be superior to usual care.
Key results
The study measured the Screening Completion Rate across four distinct groups:
- For the Inreach Strategy group, 46 participants completed screening.
- For the Outreach Strategy group, 88 participants completed screening.
- For the Both Inreach and Outreach Strategies group, 132 participants completed screening.
- For the Usual Care group, 131 participants completed screening.
What this means
The results indicate that the strategy combining both inreach and outreach efforts led to the highest number of completed colorectal cancer screenings, with 132 participants. This count was closely followed by the Usual Care group, which saw 131 participants complete screening. Individual strategies, such as the Outreach Strategy (88 participants) and the Inreach Strategy (46 participants), resulted in fewer completed screenings compared to the combined approach and usual care. These findings suggest that a multi-faceted approach incorporating both inreach and outreach elements may be effective in encouraging screening participation, though its advantage over usual care in terms of raw count was marginal in this specific dataset.
Source
The information for these trial results was obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov, a public database of clinical studies. The results for study NCT02870049 were posted on 2025-09-04 on clinicaltrials.gov.