To Compare the Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-operative Healing of the Implant
Part of paid clinical trials in Birmingham, Alabama.
- Sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Study ID
- NCT07512258
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
Notify me when recruiting opens
Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.
Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.
Conditions
- Dental Implant
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 85 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Accepted
Interventions
- Pilot Drill Guide (PDG) — PROCEDUREMatrix-based pilot drill guides fabricated using casts derived from digital wax ups of the proposed final restoration based upon initial implant planning and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol.
- Fully Guided (FG) — PROCEDURE3-D printed guides fabricated based upon digital wax ups and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol and guided implant placement kits.
Study Details
The goal of this study is to evaluate two commonly utilized surgical guide protocols to determine dental implant placement accuracy compared to pre-operative computerized planning, post-operative healing and bone levels to 12-months post-placement, and patient assessed post-operative discomfort and healing using a visual acuity scale (VAS).
Key Dates
- Start date
- Jun 30, 2026
- Status verified
- Mar 2026
- Primary completion
- Jul 31, 2027
- Completion
- Jul 31, 2028
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Active Comparator: Pilot Drill Guide (PDG)Matrix-based pilot drill guides fabricated using casts derived from digital wax ups of the proposed final restoration based upon initial implant planning and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol.
- Experimental: Fully Guided (FG3-D printed guides fabricated based upon digital wax ups and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol and guided implant placement kits
Primary Outcome Measure
Implant placement deviation from computerized planning [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
Central Contacts
- Maria Geisinger, DDS, MS205-934-4984
- Sarah Startley, DMD205-975-8711
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | 35294-0007 | Maria L Geisinger, DDS, MS (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Birmingham, AL
By research site
Related Studies
- Ridge Augmentation Using Allograft Particles Hydrated With or Without Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth FactorRecruiting · University of Alabama at Birmingham · Birmingham, Alabama
- Closed Sinus Augmentation With a Calcium Phosphosilicate PuttyRecruiting · The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · San Antonio, Texas
- Clinical Performance of Nobel N1 SystemPHASE4 · Recruiting · Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans · New Orleans, Louisiana