Comprehensive Multi-omics Characterization and Implications of Non-Pharmaceutical Dental Hygiene Product in a Randomized Controlled Large Population Study.
Part of paid clinical trials in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
- Sponsor
- Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation
- Study ID
- NCT07451782
- Status
- Completed
Conditions
- Basic Science
- Biomarker Discovery
- Intervention Studies
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 80 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Accepted
Interventions
- Oral Lozenges (Tradename pHossident) — DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTdissolvable mint flavored pHossident lozenges containing ingredients that are all FDA-approved with the GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) designation, and have years of safety demonstrated in animals, children, adults and pregnant women. The lozenge is not classified as a drug and is regulated as a nutritional supplement. The lozenge does contain the sugar substitutes called mannitol and sorbitol (sugar alcohols), as well as the natural sweetener, stevia, all of which can irritate the lower gastrointestinal tract at amounts that grossly exceed the levels that are contained in the lozenges (I lozenge contains \<l % of the recommended daily intake).
- Water additive (Tradename Protektin) — DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCommercially marketed over-the-counter Protektin drinking water additive contains ingredients that are all FDA-approved with the GRAS designation, and have years of safety demonstrated in animals, children, adults and pregnant women. The water additive is not classified as a drug and is regulated as a nutritional supplement. The water additive only contains active ingredients; it does not contain fillers, flavors or sweeteners.
Study Details
The goals of this clinical study are: 1. Survey approximately 600 persons between the ages of 18-80 regarding their medical history \& oral hygiene habits, diet \& exercise habits, and emotional \& physical stressors to understand the barriers this population may face in achieving or maintaining good oral care and whole body health. 2. Compare the survey results with the organic molecule data collected by oral swabs from each subject at three different time points over the course of their 60 day study participation to better understand how behaviors and medical history relate to oral and whole body health. 3. Assess the effectiveness of two marketed oral hygiene study products vs a control on oral microbiome--such as bacteria, fungi, viruses that live naturally in our body-as well as its impact on the oral microbiome of each subject. The study products used in this study are 1 marketed oral lozenge, 1 marketed water additive.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Apr 30, 2024
- Status verified
- Feb 2026
- Primary completion
- Jul 11, 2024
- Completion
- Jul 23, 2025
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 595 participants (actual)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- BASIC_SCIENCE
Arms
- Active Comparator: Lozenge Intervention (Tradename pHossident)This cohort was randomized and assigned into the pHossident Lozenge cohort. They received 8 lozenges per day for the duration of the study. They completes questionnaires. They were sampled orally at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 for multi-omic analyses.
- No Intervention: ControlFull participation but received no intervention
- Active Comparator: Water Additive Intervention (Tradename Protektin)This cohort was randomized and assigned into the Protektin water additive cohort. They received 2 water additive sachets per day for the duration of the study. They completes questionnaires. They were sampled orally at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 for multi-omic analyses.
Primary Outcome Measure
Metagenomic changes at 4 and 8 weeks from baseline in pHossident lozenge recipients vs Protektin water additive recipients vs control participants using shotgun sequencing of salivary DNA isolates sequencing depth of 35.4M read pairs per sample. [ Time Frame: Initial visit: baseline measurements to 8 week endpoint measurements ]
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Research Group | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55415 | - |
Find similar trials in Minneapolis, MN
Related Studies
- Neural Basis of Sensory Learning: Brain RegionsRecruiting · Indiana University · Bloomington, Indiana
- Factors Affecting Sensory and Motor LearningRecruiting · Indiana University · Bloomington, Indiana