Harnessing Communication Preferences
Part of paid clinical trials in Athens, Georgia.
- Sponsor
- Joel E. Ringdahl
- Study ID
- NCT07278544
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Communication Disabilities
- Communication, Nonverbal
- Intellectual Disability
- Self-Injurious Behavior
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 2 Years - 90 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- PrefFCT — BEHAVIORALDifferential reinforcement of alternative communication and extinction of challenging behavior.
- NonPrefFCT — BEHAVIORALDifferential reinforcement of alternative communication and extinction of challenging behavior.
Study Details
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate how preference for communication approach (e.g., using a touch talker versus picture cards) impacts treatment maintenance in the context of treatment to reduce challenging behavior exhibited by individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. As well, the clinical trial will evaluate how this preference impacts treatment relapse when care providers implement intervention and will identify potential demographic variables (e.g., age and symptom severity) that affect outcomes. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer \[is/are\]: Preferred communication strategies will persist to a greater extent when intervention is disrupted, relative to less preferred communication strategies. Communication modality preference will increase persistence for individuals with lower pre-experimental symptom severity scores and higher pre-experimental communication functioning scores. We predict demographic characteristics and developmental level will not impact intervention outcomes. Two groups will be compared. Group 1 will receive initial intervention using a preferred communication strategy. Group 2 will receive initial intervention using a non preferred, but effective, communication strategy. Intervention type will then be reversed. Researchers will compare preferred and non preferred interventions on continued expression of the communication strategy when intervention is challenged. Participants will exhibit alternative appropriate communicative behavior as a means of replacing/reducing challenging behavior. This will take place using (a) preferred communication strategies and (b) non preferred communication strategies. Following successful intervention with each type of communication, intervention will be challenged and continued use of the communication strategy will be measured.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Aug 15, 2025
- Status verified
- Dec 2025
- Primary completion
- Mar 31, 2031
- Completion
- Mar 31, 2031
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- CROSSOVER
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: PrefFCTPrefFCT involves reinforcing an appropriate communicative response determined to be preferred by the individual relative to a second appropriate communicative response. During PrefFCT, participants will receive access to the functionally relevant reinforcer following occurrences of the specified communication modality. Challenging behavior will not produce any programmed consequence.
- Experimental: NonPrefFCTNonPrefFCT involves reinforcing an appropriate communicative response determined to be less preferred by the individual relative to another appropriate communicative response. During NonPrefFCT, participants will receive access to the functionally relevant reinforcer following occurrences of the specified communication modality. Challenging behavior will not produce any programmed consequence.
Primary Outcome Measure
Persistence of Communication [ Time Frame: Change in level of communication from baseline to 6 weeks post baseline. ]
Central Contacts
- Joel Ringdahl, PhD319-594-2071
Locations (2)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Georgia | Athens | Georgia | 30602 | |
| University of Iowa | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | Matthew O'Brien, PhD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Athens, GA
Related Studies
- Cerebellar Stimulation and Cognitive ControlRecruiting · Krystal Parker, PhD · Iowa City, Iowa
- Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM)Recruiting · Emory University · Atlanta, Georgia
- Safety and Tolerability Trial of Lumateperone in Pediatric Patients With Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder or Autism Spectrum DisorderPHASE3 · Recruiting · Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. · Phoenix, Arizona
- Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Lumateperone in Pediatric Patients With Autism Spectrum DisorderPHASE1 · Recruiting · Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. · Miami, Florida