Gait After THA: Direct Anterior vs Manual Posterior vs Robotic Posterior
Part of paid clinical trials in Metairie, Louisiana.
- Sponsor
- Ochsner Health System
- Study ID
- NCT07226973
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach (manual, non-robotic) — PROCEDUREPrimary THA performed via a direct anterior approach without robotic assistance
- Total hip arthroplasty via posterior approach (manual, non-robotic) — PROCEDUREPrimary THA performed via a posterior approach without robotic assistance
- Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty via posterior approach — PROCEDUREPrimary THA via posterior approach using pre-op CT-based planning and intra-op robotic assistance
Study Details
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the gait biomechanics following THA on 3 groups of subjects undergoing DAA (manual) and PA (manual and robotic) surgical approaches.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Oct 9, 2025
- Status verified
- Nov 2025
- Primary completion
- Nov 15, 2027
- Completion
- Nov 15, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 48 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Active Comparator: Manual Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)The DAA utilizes an internervous and intermuscular approach, preserving abductor and posterior soft tissues, and is associated with reduced dislocation rates and accelerated early recovery.⁶ However, it carries a steep learning curve and an elevated risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia.
- Active Comparator: Manual Posterior ApproachPA remains the most commonly used technique worldwide, offering extensile exposure and preserved abductor function, though its historical association with increased dislocation risk has necessitated meticulous capsular and soft-tissue repair.
- Active Comparator: Robotic-Assisted Posterior ApproachRobotic-assisted THA introduces computer-navigated precision into implant alignment and biomechanical restoration. Contemporary systems (e.g., MAKO) offer intraoperative haptic guidance and preoperative CT-based planning to improve component placement accuracy.
Primary Outcome Measure
Walking speed during level gait (m/s) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-op. ]
Central Contacts
- George Chimento, MD504-736-4800
- Ken Bode504-842-1936
Locations (2)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ochsner Health Center - Elmwood | Metairie | Louisiana | 70005 | |
| Ochsner Medical Center | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70121 |
Find similar trials in Metairie, LA
Related Studies
- Systemic Oral Glucocorticoids for the Treatment of Acute Osteoarthritis Pain in the Emergency DepartmentPHASE4 · Recruiting · WellSpan Health · York, Pennsylvania
- MDR Vivacit-E Elevated StudyEnrolling By Invitation · Zimmer Biomet · South Bend, Indiana
- Platelet Rich Plasma for Musculoskeletal ConditionsRecruiting · University of Utah · Salt Lake City, Utah
- Ketogenic Diet to Reduce Osteoarthritis Pain in MCINot Yet Recruiting · University of Kansas Medical Center · Fairway, Kansas