Hysteroscopic Resection Versus Manual Vacuum Aspiration for Early Pregnancy
Part of paid clinical trials in Cleveland, Ohio.
- Sponsor
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- Study ID
- NCT07088510
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Miscarriage in First Trimester
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Age
- 18 Years - 55 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Hysteroscopic resection — PROCEDUREParticipants will undergo a hysteroscopy where a camera is placed on the inside of the uterus. Then a resector will be used to remove the pregnancy loss under direct visualization.
- Manual Vacuum Aspiration — PROCEDUREParticipants will undergo a manual vacuum aspiration with ultrasound guidance for treatment of early pregnancy loss. This is when pregnancy loss is suctioned by a machine from the uterus.
Study Details
Early pregnancy loss happens when a pregnancy that is not developing properly is found on an ultrasound before 12 weeks and 6 days. This type of loss occurs in about 10% of pregnancies. There are three main ways to treat this: waiting for it to pass naturally, using medication, or having surgery. Surgery is the most effective, working 99% of the time, compared to waiting (80% effective in 8 weeks) and medication (71-84% effective). Currently, surgery involves dilation of the cervix and curettage (removal of pregnancy tissue) with suction provided either from a manual hand-held pump or a machine. For the purposes of this study, a manual vacuum aspirator (or hand-held pump) will be used with ultrasound guidance. There is also another method called hysteroscopic resection, where the doctor uses a special camera to directly see and remove any pregnancy tissue from your uterus. Patients often want the quickest way to resolve the pregnancy loss, and physicians are unsure which surgical method is the best. It's also unclear if one type of surgery causes less scar tissue inside the uterus, affects the ability to test the tissue for genetic issues, or impacts how soon a patient can start fertility treatments again. This study aims to find out if hysteroscopic resection provides faster resolution and creates less scar tissue compared to the manual vacuum aspiration.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Mar 31, 2025
- Status verified
- Jul 2025
- Primary completion
- Apr 30, 2027
- Completion
- Apr 30, 2028
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: HysteroscopyParticipants will undergo hysteroscopic resection of early pregnancy loss under monitored anesthesia care.
- Active Comparator: Manual Vacuum AspirationParticipants will undergo manual vacuum aspiration of early pregnancy loss under monitored anesthesia care.
Primary Outcome Measure
Change in beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG) levels as measured by blood test [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post operation, 2 week post operation, 3 week post operation, 4 week post operation, 5 week post operation ]
Central Contacts
- Kylie Phillips216-285-5028
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospitals | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 |
Find similar trials in Cleveland, OH
Related Studies
- Letrozole and Misoprostol for Early Pregnancy Loss ManagementPHASE2 · Recruiting · University of Pennsylvania · Philadelphia, Pennsylvania