Improving Clinical Efficiency by Reducing Scheduled Follow-ups Using Cochlear America's Population Mean Mapping Strategy
Part of paid clinical trials in Boston, Massachusetts.
- Sponsor
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
- Study ID
- NCT06960616
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Cochlear Hearing Loss
- Deafness
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 85 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Changes in traditional follow-up — OTHERTraditional follow-up includes the following visits after activation: 1-week, 1-month, 3-months, 6-months and 1 year. With the intervention used, the 1-week follow-up is removed.
- Population mean mapping — OTHERTraditional mapping at activation involves the measurement of at least 5 electrodes (both T-levels and C-levels). The intervention uses a population mean mapping strategy where there is a pre-set dynamic range of 46 CL with a spot check of C-levels.
Study Details
The study is about the importance of each follow-up visit after activating a new cochlear implant in addition to evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of a new programming strategy from Cochlear Americas. Investigators are looking for patients who have recently selected Cochlear Americas as their cochlear implant manufacturer of choice for their upcoming surgery. The aim of this study is to determine if 1) patient outcomes remain stable when reducing follow-up appointments and 2) Cochlear's population mean mapping can produce similar outcomes with patients while additionally reducing appointment times. The hypothesis is that using population mean mapping and reducing the number of follow-up visits after activation will yield similar performance outcomes to a standard of care while decreasing the length of appointment times and number of appointments needed for each patient.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Feb 27, 2024
- Status verified
- May 2026
- Primary completion
- Nov 26, 2026
- Completion
- Feb 26, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 48 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: Population mean mapping, without 1 week follow-upReduction in the number of follow-up visits and new programming strategy.
- Experimental: Population mean mapping, traditional follow-upNew programming strategy
- Experimental: Traditional mapping*, without 1 week follow-upReduction in the number of follow-up visits.
- No Intervention: Traditional mapping, traditional follow-upTraditional follow-up plan
Primary Outcome Measure
Speech perception scores [ Time Frame: 1-year ]
Central Contacts
- Arenberg6178077904
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass Eye and Ear | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | Julie Arenberg (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Boston, MA
Related Studies
- Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Implant Electrode-neuron InterfacesRecruiting · Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · Boston, Massachusetts
- Wolfram Syndrome and WFS1-related Disorders International Registry and Clinical StudyRecruiting · Washington University School of Medicine · St Louis, Missouri
- Auditory-Cognitive Training to Optimize Outcomes for Older CI UsersEnrolling By Invitation · Gallaudet University · Washington D.C., District of Columbia
- Novel Coding Strategies for Children With Cochlear ImplantsRecruiting · NYU Langone Health · New York, New York