Comparative Effectiveness of Two Different Approaches to Radiofrequency Ablation of Lumbar Medial Branch Nerves
Part of paid clinical trials in Hershey, Pennsylvania.
- Sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Study ID
- NCT06283628
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
Notify me when recruiting opens
Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.
Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.
Conditions
- Lumbar Spondylosis
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Radiofrequency ablation of lumbar medial branch nerves. — PROCEDURETraditional approach: The electrode is introduced at a 15-20 degrees' ipsilateral oblique angle to the sagittal plane toward the junction of the superior articular process (SAP) and transverse process (TP) of the vertebral body to target the traversing medial branch nerve. Parasagittal (new) approach: The RF cannula is placed parasagittally and more dorsally. The remainder of the procedure does not differ from the traditional method.
Study Details
The purpose of this voluntary research study is to determine whether the parasagittal approach to lumbar medial branch (LMB) nerve radio frequency ablation (RFA) will have greater efficacy than the traditional approach to lumbar medial branch nerve radio frequency ablation.
Key Dates
- Start date
- May 31, 2026
- Status verified
- Oct 2025
- Primary completion
- Dec 30, 2026
- Completion
- Dec 30, 2026
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Active Comparator: Subjects with traditional approach on the right side and parasagittal approach on the left side.Patients will undergo bilateral RFA; the right side will be done following the traditional approach, and the left side will be done following the parasagittal approach. Traditional approach is done by placing the electrode at a 20 degrees' ipsilateral oblique angle to the sagittal plane toward the junction of the superior articular process and transverse process of the vertebral body to target the traversing medial branch nerve. The reason for the proposed angle is to avoid the mamillo-accessory ligament that may be ossified in up to 10% of the normal spine and potentially prevent proper coagulation of the medial branch nerve during the RFA procedure. Parasagittal (new) approach: is performed by placing the RF cannula parasagittally and more dorsally. To achieve maximum nerve coagulation, the electrode should be placed as parallel to the nerve as possible, and placing it parasagittally helps achieve this goal. The remainder of the procedure does not differ from the traditional method.
- Active Comparator: Subjects with traditional approach on the left side and parasagittal approach on the right side.Patients will undergo bilateral RFA; the left side will be done following the traditional approach, and the right side will be done following the parasagittal approach. Traditional approach is done by placing the electrode at a 20 degrees' ipsilateral oblique angle to the sagittal plane toward the junction of the superior articular process and transverse process of the vertebral body to target the traversing medial branch nerve. The reason for the proposed angle is to avoid the mamillo-accessory ligament that may be ossified in up to 10% of the normal spine and potentially prevent proper coagulation of the medial branch nerve during the RFA procedure. Parasagittal (new) approach: is performed by placing the RF cannula parasagittally and more dorsally. To achieve maximum nerve coagulation, the electrode should be placed as parallel to the nerve as possible, and placing it parasagittally helps achieve this goal. The remainder of the procedure does not differ from the traditional method.
Primary Outcome Measure
The number of patients whose procedure was successful (gained 50% or more reduction in numeric rating pain (NRS) scores). [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Central Contacts
- Nancy Ruth Jarbadan, BS717-531-6135
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penn State Hershey College of Medicine | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 |
Find similar trials in Hershey, PA
By research site
Related Studies
- The NOTICE Study: Neurosurgery and OrThopedIcs Communication Evaluation Study Following Lumbar FusionsRecruiting · Duke University · Durham, North Carolina
- Regional Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine SurgeryPHASE4 · Recruiting · John O'Toole · Chicago, Illinois
- RFA Using Multi-Tined Electrodes vs.Traditional Electrodes for Lumbar SpondylosisRecruiting · University of Arkansas · Little Rock, Arkansas