Comparative Effectiveness of Two Different Approaches to Radiofrequency Ablation of Lumbar Medial Branch Nerves

Part of paid clinical trials in Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Sponsor
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Study ID
NCT06283628
Status
Not Yet Recruiting

Notify me when recruiting opens

Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.

Not yet recruiting

Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.

Conditions

  • Lumbar Spondylosis

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Radiofrequency ablation of lumbar medial branch nerves. — PROCEDURE
    Traditional approach: The electrode is introduced at a 15-20 degrees' ipsilateral oblique angle to the sagittal plane toward the junction of the superior articular process (SAP) and transverse process (TP) of the vertebral body to target the traversing medial branch nerve. Parasagittal (new) approach: The RF cannula is placed parasagittally and more dorsally. The remainder of the procedure does not differ from the traditional method.

Study Details

The purpose of this voluntary research study is to determine whether the parasagittal approach to lumbar medial branch (LMB) nerve radio frequency ablation (RFA) will have greater efficacy than the traditional approach to lumbar medial branch nerve radio frequency ablation.

Key Dates

Start date
May 31, 2026
Status verified
Oct 2025
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026
Completion
Dec 30, 2026

Study Design

Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Active Comparator: Subjects with traditional approach on the right side and parasagittal approach on the left side.
    Patients will undergo bilateral RFA; the right side will be done following the traditional approach, and the left side will be done following the parasagittal approach. Traditional approach is done by placing the electrode at a 20 degrees' ipsilateral oblique angle to the sagittal plane toward the junction of the superior articular process and transverse process of the vertebral body to target the traversing medial branch nerve. The reason for the proposed angle is to avoid the mamillo-accessory ligament that may be ossified in up to 10% of the normal spine and potentially prevent proper coagulation of the medial branch nerve during the RFA procedure. Parasagittal (new) approach: is performed by placing the RF cannula parasagittally and more dorsally. To achieve maximum nerve coagulation, the electrode should be placed as parallel to the nerve as possible, and placing it parasagittally helps achieve this goal. The remainder of the procedure does not differ from the traditional method.
  • Active Comparator: Subjects with traditional approach on the left side and parasagittal approach on the right side.
    Patients will undergo bilateral RFA; the left side will be done following the traditional approach, and the right side will be done following the parasagittal approach. Traditional approach is done by placing the electrode at a 20 degrees' ipsilateral oblique angle to the sagittal plane toward the junction of the superior articular process and transverse process of the vertebral body to target the traversing medial branch nerve. The reason for the proposed angle is to avoid the mamillo-accessory ligament that may be ossified in up to 10% of the normal spine and potentially prevent proper coagulation of the medial branch nerve during the RFA procedure. Parasagittal (new) approach: is performed by placing the RF cannula parasagittally and more dorsally. To achieve maximum nerve coagulation, the electrode should be placed as parallel to the nerve as possible, and placing it parasagittally helps achieve this goal. The remainder of the procedure does not differ from the traditional method.

Primary Outcome Measure

The number of patients whose procedure was successful (gained 50% or more reduction in numeric rating pain (NRS) scores). [ Time Frame: Baseline ]

Central Contacts

Locations (1)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
Penn State Hershey College of MedicineHersheyPennsylvania17033
Nancy Ruth Jarbadan, BS
717-531-6135

Find similar trials in Hershey, PA

Related Studies