Decompression Versus Decompression and Fusion
Part of paid clinical trials in Boston, Massachusetts.
- Sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Study ID
- NCT04542720
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Adjacent Segment Disease
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Accepted
Interventions
- Observational: Decompression — PROCEDUREPatients will undergo decompression alone of the supradjacent level. The surgical technique will be surgeon dependent. All surgeons will be encouraged to avoid damaging facet joints above the fusion mass, retaining 50% of the pars of the decompressed level and performing as minimal of a medial facetectomy as necessary.
- Observational: Extension Fusion — PROCEDUREPatients will undergo decompression and extension of posterior instrumentation and fusion. This may or may not include exchange of pre-existing instrumentation. The use of interbody cages will be left to the discretion of the treating surgeon. The purpose of introducing this heterogeneity is to increase the generalizability of the trial results. The fusion cohort will not utilize bone morphogenetic protein products.
Study Details
Adjacent segment disease (ASD) in the lumbar spine is a well-known sequela of lumbar fusion surgery. The annual incidence of adjacent level re-operation is approximately 3% with a ten-year prevalence of 20-30%. Frequently, the surgical treatment involves decompression of the adjacent level coupled with extension of the instrumentation and fusion. Advocates of this paradigm cite the altered kinematics and biomechanics of levels adjacent to a lumbar fusion mass. Furthermore, decompressed levels adjacent to a fused segments are associated with higher rates of ASD in retrospective studies. Yet, a retrospective review of higher quality data concluded decompression adjacent to single-level fusion provides similar outcomes compared to fusions extending across the decompressed segments. Given the conflicting data currently available, higher quality data are needed to guide surgical decision-making in ASD. The purpose of this trial is to prospectively compare decompression and decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar ASD.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Sep 1, 2020
- Status verified
- Nov 2025
- Primary completion
- Sep 30, 2027
- Completion
- Sep 30, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 96 participants (estimated)
Arms
- Arm: Observational: DecompressionEligible patients may have a preference for the surgical procedure they wish to have. In these instances, they may choose to undergo a decompression alone or a decompression with extension of fusion. These patients are eligible for the study and will be enrolled under observational arms. This arm refers to the decompression alone observational study arm.
- Arm: Observational: Extension FusionEligible patients may have a preference for the surgical procedure they wish to have. In these instances, they may choose to undergo a decompression alone or a decompression with extension of fusion. These patients are eligible for the study and will be enrolled under observational arms. This arm refers to the decompression with extension of fusion observational study arm.
Primary Outcome Measure
Global Health, Physical [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-operation ]
Central Contacts
- Daniel Tobert, MD617-643-3932
- Amelia L Osgood, BA617-643-3932
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | Daniel Tobert, MD Daniel Tobert, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |