Using tDCS in Speech-based Stroke Rehabilitation
Part of paid clinical trials in New York, New York.
- Sponsor
- NYU Langone Health
- Study ID
- NCT03452202
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Apraxia of Speech
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 99 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Soterix 1x1 line tDCS low-intensity stimulator — DEVICEIntroduction of the independent variable (treatment) across three different points in time. Participants will be randomly assigned to have each treatment phase begin after 3, 4, or 6 baseline sessions. This current stimulates the cortex, with anodal stimulation leading to a depolarized state in which neurons are more likely to fire.
- Sham — DEVICEPatients will have two electrodes applied (one anode, one cathode) administering no stimulation
Study Details
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the effect of treatment for acquired speech impairment can be enhanced by combining effective behavioral treatment with non-invasive brain stimulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which delivers low-intensity current to the scalp, and is a safe and well-tolerated approach that poses a non-significant risk to participants. tDCS provides low intensity neural stimulation which has been shown to facilitate motor learning in other domains of stroke rehabilitation such as arm motor learning but the potential to enhance speech motor learning has not been explored. This will be examined with a series of single-case experimental designs.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Jan 11, 2019
- Status verified
- Jun 2026
- Primary completion
- Apr 30, 2027
- Completion
- Apr 30, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- CROSSOVER
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: Active Stimulationcrossover design such that each participant receives behavioral treatment twice - once with active stimulation and once with sham stimulation - in order to evaluate differences in improvement based on treatment condition.
- Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulationcrossover design such that each participant receives behavioral treatment twice - once with active stimulation and once with sham stimulation - in order to evaluate differences in improvement based on treatment condition.
Primary Outcome Measure
Change in accuracy in recordings from tasks from baseline to post treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Months ]
Central Contacts
- Buchwald Lab
Locations (2)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York University School of Medicine | New York | New York | 10016 | Buchwald Lab Adam Adam Buchwald, PhD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
| Burke Rehabilitation Hospital | White Plains | New York | 10605 | Josette Hartnett, MPH Erika Trovato, DO (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in New York, NY
Related Studies
- Longitudinal Multi-Modality Imaging in Progressive Apraxia of SpeechPHASE4 · Recruiting · Mayo Clinic · Rochester, Minnesota
- The Neurobiology of Two Distinct Types of Progressive Apraxia of SpeechRecruiting · Mayo Clinic · Rochester, Minnesota
- Clinico-Pathologic-Genetic-Imaging Study of Neurodegenerative and Related DisordersEnrolling By Invitation · Mayo Clinic · Rochester, Minnesota
- Motor Imagery for Treatment Enhancement and Efficacy in Persons With Apraxia of SpeechRecruiting · University of Central Florida · Orlando, Florida