Study of Efficacy and Safety in Polycythemia Vera Subjects Who Are Resistant to or Intolerant of Hydroxyurea: JAK Inhibitor INC424 (INCB018424) Tablets Versus Best Available Care: (The RESPONSE Trial)
Part of paid clinical trials in Birmingham, Alabama.
- Sponsor
- Incyte Corporation
- Study ID
- NCT01243944
- Phase
- PHASE3
- Status
- Completed
Conditions
- Polycythemia Vera
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- ruxolitinib tablets — DRUGStarting dose of 10 mg BID with individualized dose titration ranging from 5 mg QD to 25 mg BID based on safety and efficacy
- Best Available Therapy (BAT) — OTHERBest Available Therapy (BAT) will be selected by the Investigator for each participant. BAT may not include experimental agents (i.e. those not approved for the treatment of any indication) as well as a limited number of other selected drugs in accordance with the protocol-defined requirements.
Study Details
This pivotal phase III trial (CINC424B2301) is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib (INC424) to Best Available Therapy (BAT) in participants with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea (HU).
Key Dates
- Start date
- Oct 27, 2010
- Status verified
- Feb 2019
- Primary completion
- Jan 15, 2014
- Completion
- Feb 9, 2018
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 222 participants (actual)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: ruxolitinib tabletsStarting dose of 10 mg BID with individualized dose titration ranging from 5 mg once a day (QD) to 25 mg BID based on safety and efficacy
- Other: Best Available TherapyBest Available Therapy (BAT) will be selected by the Investigator for each participant. BAT may not include experimental agents (i.e. those not approved for the treatment of any indication) as well as a limited number of other selected drugs in accordance with the protocol-defined requirements.
Primary Outcome Measure
The Percentage of Participants Achieving a Primary Response at Week 32 [ Time Frame: 32 Weeks ]
Locations (28)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Birmingham | Alabama | - | - |
| - | Scottsdale | Arizona | - | - |
| - | Pomona | California | - | - |
| - | Sacramento | California | - | - |
| - | San Diego | California | - | - |
| - | Bridgeport | Connecticut | - | - |
| - | New Haven | Connecticut | - | - |
| - | Boynton Beach | Florida | - | - |
| - | Fort Myers | Florida | - | - |
| - | Jacksonville | Florida | - | - |
| - | Winter Park | Florida | - | - |
| - | Boise | Idaho | - | - |
| - | Chicago | Illinois | - | - |
| - | Lafayette | Louisiana | - | - |
| - | Scarborough | Maine | - | - |
| - | Baltimore | Maryland | - | - |
| - | Columbia | Maryland | - | - |
| - | Southfield | Michigan | - | - |
| - | Jefferson City | Missouri | - | - |
| - | St Louis | Missouri | - | - |
| - | Omaha | Nebraska | - | - |
| - | Morristown | New Jersey | - | - |
| - | Somerville | New Jersey | - | - |
| - | Charleston | South Carolina | - | - |
| - | Greenville | South Carolina | - | - |
| - | Nashville | Tennessee | - | - |
| - | Houston | Texas | - | - |
| - | Seattle | Washington | - | - |
Related Studies
- Decitabine With Ruxolitinib, Fedratinib or Pacritinib for the Treatment of Accelerated/Blast Phase Myeloproliferative NeoplasmsPHASE2 · Recruiting · University of Washington · Seattle, Washington
- An Optimal Dose Finding Study of N-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Myeloproliferative NeoplasmsPHASE1/PHASE2 · Recruiting · University of California, Irvine · Irvine, California
- Curcumin to Improve Inflammation and Symptoms in Patients With Clonal Cytopenia of Undetermined Significance, Low Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Myeloproliferative NeoplasmsPHASE2 · Recruiting · University of Southern California · Los Angeles, California
- Study on Efficacy and Safety of Givinostat Versus Hydroxyurea in Patients With Polycythemia VeraPHASE3 · Recruiting · Italfarmaco · Birmingham, Alabama