Combined Functional Electrical and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Foot Drop
Part of paid clinical trials in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
- Sponsor
- Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia
- Study ID
- NCT07592221
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Falls
- Foot Drop
- Post Stroke Recovery
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Standard protocol for combo of FES and tDCS — BEHAVIORALThe gait training consisted of treadmill training with forward and backward ambulation with speed progression as appropriate, ambulation over obstacles, ramp ambulation forwards and backwards, and stair ambulation up and down. In each condition, cues were to increase toe clearance on the affected limb and achieve heel strike at initial contact. Vitals were collected at the start and end of each session, and heart rate was measured at the end of each activity, along with the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE), to determine whether the participant was working at a higher intensity than baseline.
Study Details
This study aims to determine if combining the treatments of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) will better help persons with stroke who have difficulty lifting their toes. As part of the treatment, subjects will receive electrical stimulation through pads on their scalp (similar to what one may have received in physical therapy previously to an arm or leg). This protocol is called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Subjects will also receive electrical stimulation through pads on their leg. This is called functional electrical stimulation (FES). During treatment sessions, subjects will also perform leg activity/strengthening exercises. The aim is to evaluate whether combining FES and tDCS within a PT session would reduce foot drop as indicated by improvements in the amount of toe clearance and ankle motion persons with stroke.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Jun 1, 2026
- Status verified
- Apr 2026
- Primary completion
- Dec 31, 2028
- Completion
- Aug 30, 2029
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: FES and tDCSThe tDCS was applied as a bilateral montage with the anode of the tDCS device (ActivaDose II, ActivaTek Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) applied to the involved hemisphere and the cathode over the unaffected hemisphere. The dosage of the tDCS device was one mA for 60 minutes for the duration of the gait training delivered via a pair of sponge electrodes moistened with 0.9% NaCl solution. The exact locations for the electrode placements were based on a 20-point electrode system, in which we chose two points that targeted the motor cortex region corresponding to the left lower limb. Treatments were performed twice weekly over the 8 weeks. The FES was administered to the tibialis anterior muscle of the impaired lower extremity with one electrode over the common peroneal nerve at the head of the fibula and the other over a motor point in the middle of the muscle belly of the tibialis anterior muscle.
- Active Comparator: FES with tDCS subthresholdThe tDCS was applied as a bilateral montage with the anode of the tDCS device (ActivaDose II, ActivaTek Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA) applied to the involved hemisphere and the cathode over the unaffected hemisphere. The dosage of the tDCS device was set initially at one mA for 60 minutes and then for the duration of the gait training the machine was turned to subthreshold levels, delivered via a pair of sponge electrodes moistened with 0.9% NaCl solution. The exact locations for the electrode placements were based on a 20-point electrode system, in which we chose two points that targeted the motor cortex region corresponding to the left lower limb. Treatments were performed twice weekly over the 8 weeks. The FES was administered to the tibialis anterior muscle of the impaired lower extremity with one electrode over the common peroneal nerve at the head of the fibula and the other over a motor point in the middle of the muscle belly of the tibialis anterior muscle.
Primary Outcome Measure
minimum toe clearance [ Time Frame: A pretest at baseline 2-3 days prior to the start of the intervention and then after 12 training sessions (between 6 and 8 weeks) posttests will occur 2-3 days after the 12th and final intervention is completed. ]
Central Contacts
- Greg Thielman, EdD8562667863
- Sylvester Carter, PhD215 596 7087
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saint Joseph's University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | - |
Find similar trials in Philadelphia, PA
Related Studies
- Seated Ankle Robot for Foot Drop in Aging and Disabled Populations: A Demonstration ProjectNot Yet Recruiting · Baltimore VA Medical Center · Baltimore, Maryland
- Ankle Robotics After StrokeRecruiting · NextStep Robotics Inc. · Baltimore, Maryland
- Adapting, Implementing and Evaluating the Effectiveness of HARP for People With DisabilitiesRecruiting · Washington University School of Medicine · St Louis, Missouri
- Steady Stride Fall Prevention Protocol vs Standard of CareRecruiting · Steady Strides: Fall Prevention and Stroke Rehabilitation Medical Institute · Baltimore, Maryland