The Role of Breathing Perception in Respiratory Control
Part of paid clinical trials in Bloomington, Indiana.
- Sponsor
- Indiana University
- Study ID
- NCT07470099
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
Notify me when recruiting opens
Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.
Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.
Conditions
- Work of Breathing
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 40 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Accepted
Interventions
- Ambient Noise — OTHERParticipants will complete the breathing task with ambient (or normal) auditory feedback (\~10 decibels).
- Increased Auditory Feedback — OTHERParticipants will complete the breathing task with increased auditory feedback of ventilation (\~70 decibels). Specifically, a small microphone will be placed in the device that participants breathe through to increase the sound of the participants breath.
- Noise Distraction — OTHERParticipants will complete the breathing task without auditory feedback of ventilation. Specifically, participants will wear noise cancelling headphones and will listen to a self-selected music playlist at a constant volume (\~80 decibels).
Study Details
Warfighters are frequently exposed to environments and life-support systems that increase breathing resistance and the work of breathing (WOB), such as aircraft on-board oxygen generation systems and underwater breathing apparatuses. Elevated WOB then increases the perception of breathing difficulty (dyspnea) and has been associated with impaired cognitive performance, including slower reaction time and reduced accuracy during attention-demanding tasks. These effects are particularly concerning in operational settings that require rapid decision-making and precise motor responses. Despite growing recognition of this issue, critical gaps remain regarding strategies to mitigate the perceptual and cognitive consequences of elevated inspiratory resistance, especially under realistic operational stressors. The objective of this experiment is to determine whether modifying the sensory perception of breathing alters breathing perception and cognitive performance during inspiratory resistance. Auditory feedback of ventilation will be manipulated (normal, reduced, or amplified) to assess whether altering breathing-related sensory input affects breathing perception and cognitive performance without changing mechanical load.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Jun 1, 2027
- Status verified
- Mar 2026
- Primary completion
- Jun 1, 2027
- Completion
- Sep 30, 2028
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- CROSSOVER
- Primary purpose
- BASIC_SCIENCE
Arms
- Active Comparator: Ambient noise, then music distraction, then increased ventilation auditory feedbackParticipants will complete 3 full length breathing tasks, one under each auditory condition. The order of condition exposure will be assigned via randomization.
- Active Comparator: Ambient noise, then increased ventilation auditory feedback, then music distractionParticipants will complete 3 full length breathing tasks, one under each auditory condition. The order of condition exposure will be assigned via randomization.
- Active Comparator: Music distraction, then ambient noise, then increased ventilation auditory feedbackParticipants will complete 3 full length breathing tasks, one under each auditory condition. The order of condition exposure will be assigned via randomization.
- Active Comparator: Increased ventilation auditory feedback, then ambient noise, then music distractionParticipants will complete 3 full length breathing tasks, one under each auditory condition. The order of condition exposure will be assigned via randomization.
- Active Comparator: Increased ventilation auditory feedback, then music distraction, then ambient noiseParticipants will complete 3 full length breathing tasks, one under each auditory condition. The order of condition exposure will be assigned via randomization.
- Active Comparator: Music distraction, then increased ventilation auditory feedback, then ambient noiseParticipants will complete 3 full length breathing tasks, one under each auditory condition. The order of condition exposure will be assigned via randomization.
Primary Outcome Measure
Change in Stroop Color-Word Test Time Performance [ Time Frame: Before and after each Day 1 breathing task (approximately 60 minutes in duration) ]
Central Contacts
- Timothy D Mickleborough, PhD812-855-0753
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multidisciplinary Engineering and Sciences Hall (MESH) | Bloomington | Indiana | 47405 | Timothy D Mickleborough, PhD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Bloomington, IN
Related Studies
- The Role of Heliox in Respiratory ControlPHASE4 · Recruiting · Indiana University · Bloomington, Indiana
- The Role of Environmental Temperatures in Respiratory ControlNot Yet Recruiting · Indiana University · Bloomington, Indiana