Induction and Consolidation With Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Idarubicin, and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Part of paid clinical trials in Portland, Oregon.

Sponsor
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Study ID
NCT07228273
Phase
PHASE2
Status
Recruiting

Conditions

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Biospecimen Collection — PROCEDURE
    Undergo blood sample collection
  • Bone Marrow Aspiration — PROCEDURE
    Undergo bone marrow aspiration
  • Bone Marrow Biopsy — PROCEDURE
    Undergo bone marrow biopsy
  • Cytarabine — DRUG
    Given IV
  • Daunorubicin — DRUG
    Given IV
  • Echocardiography Test — PROCEDURE
    Undergo ECHO
  • Fludarabine — DRUG
    Given IV
  • Idarubicin — DRUG
    Given IV
  • Multigated Acquisition Scan — PROCEDURE
    Undergo MUGA scan
  • Questionnaire Administration — OTHER
    Ancillary studies
  • Venetoclax — DRUG
    Given PO

Study Details

This phase II trial compares induction and consolidation therapy with fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and venetoclax to cytarabine and daunorubicin induction and cytarabine consolidation for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients with AML often receive induction and consolidation therapy. Induction therapy is given first to get the patient's AML under control (remission). Consolidation therapy is given after the cancer has disappeared following the initial therapy. Consolidation therapy is used to kill any cancer cells that may be left in the body. Chemotherapy drugs, such as fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and daunorubicin, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Giving fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and venetoclax for induction and consolidation therapy may be more effective in treating AML.

Key Dates

Start date
Dec 12, 2025
Status verified
Jan 2026
Primary completion
Jun 24, 2029
Completion
Aug 24, 2029

Study Design

Enrollment
102 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Experimental: Arm 1 (fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, venetoclax)
    See Detailed Description.
  • Active Comparator: Arm 2 (cytarabine, daunorubicin)
    INDUCTION: Patients receive cytarabine IV on days 1-7 and daunorubicin IV on days 1-3 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 1 cycle in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients achieving CR, CRh, CRi, or MLFS after one induction cycle proceed to consolidation. Patients achieving PR after one induction cycle may proceed to consolidation at the investigator's discretion. Patients with ≥ 5% blasts after one induction cycle may receive a second cycle of induction therapy. CONSOLIDATION: Participants receive cytarabine IV over 3 hours BID on days 1, 3, and 5 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 4 post-induction cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo ECHO or MUGA scan during screening and on study as clinically indicated. Patients also undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy and blood sample collection throughout the trial.

Primary Outcome Measure

Percentage of participants achieving measurable residual disease negative composite complete remission (CRc-MRD-) [ Time Frame: Up to 30 days post last dose of study drug ]

Locations (1)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
OHSU Knight Cancer InstitutePortlandOregon97239
Curtis A. Lachowiez
503-494-6157
Curtis A. Lachowiez (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)

Find similar trials in Portland, OR

By condition

Related Studies