High vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccines in Lung Transplant (Repeater)

Part of paid clinical trials in Nashville, Tennessee.

Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study ID
NCT07192458
Phase
PHASE2
Status
Recruiting

Conditions

  • Immunization; Infection|Transplantation Infection|Influenza
  • Influenza

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Fluzone High Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine — BIOLOGICAL
    Fluzone High-Dose (Influenza Vaccine) for intramuscular use is an inactivated influenza vaccine, prepared from influenza viruses propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. The virus- containing allantoic fluid is harvested and inactivated with formaldehyde. Influenza virus is concentrated and purified in a linear sucrose density gradient solution using a continuous flow centrifuge. The virus is then chemically disrupted using a non-ionic surfactant, octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton® X-100), producing a split virus. The split virus containing hemagglutinin (HA) antigen is further purified and then suspended in sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution. The Fluzone High-Dose process uses an additional concentration factor after the ultrafiltration step to obtain a higher HA antigen concentration. The purified split virus from the three strains included in the vaccine are produced separately and then combined to make the trivalent formulation.
  • Fluzone Standard Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine — BIOLOGICAL
    Fluzone Standard Dose is a vaccine indicated for active immunization for the prevention of disease caused by influenza A subtype viruses and type B virus contained in the vaccine.

Study Details

This will be a follow-up study to the "Comparison of High Dose vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccine in Lung Allograft Recipient" study (DMID Protocol Number 22-0014) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Lung transplantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with advanced lung disease, and is also associated with an improvement in quality of life. However, due to the need for life-long immunosuppression to prevent acute cellular rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction ("chronic rejection"), lung transplant recipients are at risk for developing major infections. In fact, one-year survival is 85%, with infection being the leading cause of death within the first year post-transplant. We will conduct a follow-up phase II, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the impact of subsequent administration of two doses of HD-IIV compared to two doses of SD-IIV among lung recipients during the early post-transplant period. Demonstration of improved immunogenicity from two doses of HD-IIV over consecutive influenza seasons would provide potential broad benefit in reducing influenza disease and its associated complications in lung transplant recipients. Moreover, studying vaccine immunogenicity and safety in the same participants over consecutive years can provide insight into the influence of immunosuppression levels and allograft aging on vaccine-mediated immune modulation. This proposed study design will contribute significantly to influenza vaccination guidance and policy for the highly vulnerable lung transplant population. This proposed study is designed to address several key knowledge gaps in vaccine-mediated protection of lung transplant recipients against influenza: * Is there increased immunogenicity with administration of one or two doses of HD-IIV or SD-IIV in the subsequent season compared to two doses of HD-IIV or SD-IIV in the first season? * What is the durability of the humoral and cellular immune response between influenza seasons and does two doses of HD-IIV or SD-IIV sustain higher HAI titers compared to two doses of HD-IIV or SD-IIV in the first season? * What is the impact of maintenance immunosuppression levels on influenza vaccine immunogenicity within the same participant? * Will the optimal immunogenic vaccination strategy be associated with an acceptable long-term safety profile over successive influenza seasons, including injection-site and systemic reactions, allosensitization, and organ rejection?

Key Dates

Start date
Sep 17, 2025
Status verified
Oct 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028
Completion
Dec 31, 2029

Study Design

Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION

Arms

  • Experimental: Fluzone: Two Doses High Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
    Fluzone: Two Doses of HD-IIV
  • Experimental: Fluzone: Two Doses Standard Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
    Fluzone: Two Doses of of SD-IIV

Primary Outcome Measure

Immunogenicity: Geometric Mean Titers of Influenza Vaccine Antibodies [ Time Frame: Four-eight weeks following the second study vaccination ]

Central Contacts

Locations (1)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennessee37232
Natahsa Halasa, MD, MPH
6153223346
Shari D. Barto
615-421-0942
Natahsa Halasa, MD, MPH (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Anil J. Trindade, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Kevin Dee, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)

Find similar trials in Nashville, TN

Related Studies