Randomization for the Identification of Best Treatment Intensity for Less Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myeloid Neoplasms
Part of paid clinical trials in Seattle, Washington.
- Sponsor
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
- Study ID
- NCT07094750
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
Notify me when recruiting opens
Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.
Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.
Conditions
- Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Myeloid Neoplasm
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Biospecimen Collection — PROCEDUREUndergo blood sample collection
- Bone Marrow Collection — PROCEDUREUndergo bone marrow assessment
- Electronic Health Record Review — OTHERAncillary studies
- Questionnaire Administration — OTHERAncillary studies
Study Details
This clinical trial studies whether less fit adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myeloid neoplasms are willing to let a computer program decide (randomization) whether they receive lower- or higher-intensity chemotherapy. Historically, treatment decision-making for patients with AML or myeloid neoplasms has divided patients into two categories, with patients considered fit receiving intensive "curative" chemotherapy, and patients considered unfit, such as older patients with a higher risk of early death from therapy, receiving non-intensive "palliative" therapy or no therapy. With the introduction of new treatment agents, it has become difficult to determine the difference between intensive and non-intensive therapy, especially for patients considered unfit for whom treatment-related side effects remain a concern. Treatment intensity is best identified through randomized trials but often patients are unwilling to undergo randomization due to preset beliefs. However, with improved supportive care and the awareness that new treatment agents may have similar risks as intensive therapy, it may be possible that more patients are willing to be randomized. This may help identify the best treatment intensity for less fit adults with AML or myeloid neoplasms, which may improve outcomes.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Jun 1, 2026
- Status verified
- Jul 2025
- Primary completion
- Jun 1, 2029
- Completion
- Jun 1, 2029
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Arms
- Experimental: Arm I (randomized higher-intensity therapy)Patients receive SOC or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as 7+3 regimen at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
- Experimental: Arm II (randomized lower-intensity therapy)Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than 5+2 regimen at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
- Active Comparator: Arm III (patient choice higher-intensity therapy)Patients receive SOC or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as 7+3 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
- Active Comparator: Arm IV (patient choice lower-intensity therapy)Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than 5+2 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
Primary Outcome Measure
Willingness to randomize (Feasibility) [ Time Frame: At baseline ]
Central Contacts
- Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD206-606-4643
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium | Seattle | Washington | 98109 | Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Seattle, WA
Related Studies
- 211^At-BC8-B10 Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, or Mixed-Phenotype Acute LeukemiaPHASE1/PHASE2 · Recruiting · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center · Seattle, Washington
- HA-1 T TCR T Cell Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia After Donor Stem Cell TransplantPHASE1 · Recruiting · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center · Seattle, Washington
- Fractionated Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPHASE2 · Recruiting · University of Washington · Seattle, Washington
- Naive T Cell Depletion for Preventing Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease in Children and Young Adults With Blood Cancers Undergoing Donor Stem Cell TransplantPHASE2 · Recruiting · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center · Los Angeles, California