Randomization for the Identification of Best Treatment Intensity for Less Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myeloid Neoplasms

Part of paid clinical trials in Seattle, Washington.

Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Study ID
NCT07094750
Status
Not Yet Recruiting

Notify me when recruiting opens

Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.

Not yet recruiting

Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.

Conditions

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Biospecimen Collection — PROCEDURE
    Undergo blood sample collection
  • Bone Marrow Collection — PROCEDURE
    Undergo bone marrow assessment
  • Electronic Health Record Review — OTHER
    Ancillary studies
  • Questionnaire Administration — OTHER
    Ancillary studies

Study Details

This clinical trial studies whether less fit adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myeloid neoplasms are willing to let a computer program decide (randomization) whether they receive lower- or higher-intensity chemotherapy. Historically, treatment decision-making for patients with AML or myeloid neoplasms has divided patients into two categories, with patients considered fit receiving intensive "curative" chemotherapy, and patients considered unfit, such as older patients with a higher risk of early death from therapy, receiving non-intensive "palliative" therapy or no therapy. With the introduction of new treatment agents, it has become difficult to determine the difference between intensive and non-intensive therapy, especially for patients considered unfit for whom treatment-related side effects remain a concern. Treatment intensity is best identified through randomized trials but often patients are unwilling to undergo randomization due to preset beliefs. However, with improved supportive care and the awareness that new treatment agents may have similar risks as intensive therapy, it may be possible that more patients are willing to be randomized. This may help identify the best treatment intensity for less fit adults with AML or myeloid neoplasms, which may improve outcomes.

Key Dates

Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Status verified
Jul 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2029
Completion
Jun 1, 2029

Study Design

Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Arms

  • Experimental: Arm I (randomized higher-intensity therapy)
    Patients receive SOC or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as 7+3 regimen at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
  • Experimental: Arm II (randomized lower-intensity therapy)
    Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than 5+2 regimen at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
  • Active Comparator: Arm III (patient choice higher-intensity therapy)
    Patients receive SOC or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as 7+3 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
  • Active Comparator: Arm IV (patient choice lower-intensity therapy)
    Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than 5+2 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.

Primary Outcome Measure

Willingness to randomize (Feasibility) [ Time Frame: At baseline ]

Central Contacts

Locations (1)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer ConsortiumSeattleWashington98109
Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD
206-606-4643
Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)

Find similar trials in Seattle, WA

By condition

Related Studies