Understanding How Powered Componentry Impacts K2-Level Transfemoral Amputee Gait
Part of paid clinical trials in Chicago, Illinois.
- Sponsor
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
- Study ID
- NCT06433648
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Amputation
- Amputation of Knee
- Amputation, Traumatic
- Amputation; Traumatic, Limb
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 95 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Ottobock CLeg4 + Ottobock foot — DEVICECommercially available Ottobock CLeg 4 microprocessor knee unit and Ottobock foot.
- SRALAB Hybrid Knee + Polycentric Ankle — DEVICEExperimental powered prosthesis: SRALAB Hybrid Knee and powered polycentric ankle.
- SRALAB Hybrid Knee + Passive Ankle — DEVICEExperimental powered prosthesis: SRALAB Hybrid Knee and passive ankle.
- Ottobock CLeg 4 + Polycentric Ankle — DEVICECommercially available Ottobock CLeg 4 prosthetic knee and SRALAB powered polycentric ankle.
Study Details
The goal of this study is to understand how providing power at the knee or ankle individually, or providing power at both the knee and ankle, impacts ambulation for K2 level transfemoral amputees. Aim 1: measure functional performance of K2 level ambulators when using a commercially available passive microprocessor knee prosthesis (Ottobock Cleg/Ottobock foot) or a powered knee and ankle prosthesis (SRALab Hybrid Knee and SRAlab Polycentric Powered Ankle. Aim 2: Participants will be evaluated on the contribution of adding power at the knee only or the ankle only. Aim 3: The investigators will evaluate the functional performance after intensive clinical gait training on the powered knee and ankle prosthesis (SRALab Hybrid Knee and SRALab Polycentric Powered Ankle). Our hypothesis is that providing powered componentry will improve function and that intensive training will magnify those improvements.
Key Dates
- Start date
- May 1, 2023
- Status verified
- May 2024
- Primary completion
- Jun 30, 2028
- Completion
- Jun 30, 2029
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- CROSSOVER
- Primary purpose
- BASIC_SCIENCE
Arms
- Active Comparator: Transfemoral Amputee participants: Ottobock Cleg4 + Ottobock foot; Hybrid Knee + Polycentric AnkleParticipant is fit with the commercially available device (Ottobock Cleg 4/Ottobock foot), they will receive standard of care clinical training for 3-4 sessions over 4 weeks, plus 1 session for outcome assessments. Participant is then fit with the SRALAB Hybrid knee and SRALAB Polycentric Ankle prosthesis, they again will receive clinical training for 3-4 sessions over 4 weeks, plus 1 session for outcome assessments.
- Experimental: Transfemoral Amputee participants: Ottobock CLeg4 + Polycentric Ankle, Hybrid Knee + Passive AnkleFor this arm, transfemoral amputees will participate in an AB/BA randomized crossover study. Before each arm of the cross-over, baseline data will be taken with the Ottobock Cleg 4/Ottobock foot or their clinically prescribed microprocessor knee unit/foot. Condition A is CLeg + Polycentric Ankle Condition B is SRALab Hybrid knee + Passive Ankle Subjects will participate in 2 sessions over 2 weeks, each lasting 2-3 hours to have the device tuned for the specific condition (A or B). On the third week, they will participate in 2 visits to complete functional outcome measures, biomechanical and metabolic assessments. They will then switch conditions, and repeat the protocol for the second condition. There will not be a washout period between conditions, but subjects will complete outcome measures with the Ottobock Cleg 4/Ottobock foot or their clinically prescribed microprocessor knee unit/foot prior to each arm of the crossover to obtain baseline data.
- Experimental: Transfemoral Amputee participants: SRALAB Hybrid knee + Polycentric Ankle, Ottobock Cleg4 + OB footDuring this arm, participants will receive intensive clinical training with the SRALAB Hybrid knee + Polycentric Ankle twice per week over 8 weeks, lasting 2-3 hours. Training will include patient-driven therapy to achieve participants' individual therapy goals, functional mobility and community skills. At the end of the 8-week training period, subjects will complete the same set of functional outcome measures, biomechanical and metabolic assessments in previous arms. To complete this arm, participants will again complete training and outcome measures with the Ottobock Cleg4/Ottobock or their clinically prescribed microprocessor knee unit/foot over 3 visits.
Primary Outcome Measure
Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis (AMPRO) score [ Time Frame: Completed at visit during week 5, week 10, week 11, week 14, week 15, week 18, week 35 and week 38. ]
Central Contacts
- Suzanne Finucane, MS, PTA312-238-0937
- Levi Hargrove, PhD312-238-2080
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shirley Ryan AbilityLab | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | Levi Hargrove, PhD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Chicago, IL
Related Studies
- Powered Prosthesis for Use With TF Osseointegration RecipientsRecruiting · Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · Chicago, Illinois
- Effects of Myoelectric Channel Count and Targeting for Upper Limb Prosthetic ControlRecruiting · Liberating Technologies, Inc. · Chicago, Illinois
- Neuromusculoskeletal Interface for Bionic ArmsNot Yet Recruiting · Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · Chicago, Illinois
- Human Upper Extremity AllotransplantationPHASE2 · Recruiting · Johns Hopkins University · Baltimore, Maryland