From Opinion to Evidence: Multi-site Evaluation of Custom Dynamic Orthosis Best Practices
Part of paid clinical trials in San Diego, California.
- Sponsor
- Jason Wilken
- Study ID
- NCT06352788
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Foot Injury
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 65 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Modular Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO) — DEVICEThe CDO will use a modular design that includes a full length foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee.
- Mono Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO) — DEVICEThe CDO will use a mono design that includes a full length foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee.
Study Details
This study is designed to support evidence-based practice and optimal care by evaluating how different configurations of two types of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) influences outcomes following traumatic lower extremity injury.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Jul 2, 2024
- Status verified
- Dec 2025
- Primary completion
- Aug 31, 2027
- Completion
- Sep 1, 2028
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 35 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- CROSSOVER
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: NoCDO, A, B, CParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration A, CDO configuration B, and finally CDO configuration C.
- Experimental: NoCDO, A, C, BParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration A, CDO configuration C, and finally CDO configuration B.
- Experimental: NoCDO, B, A, CParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration B, CDO configuration A, and finally CDO configuration C.
- Experimental: NoCDO, B, C, AParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration B, CDO configuration C, and finally CDO configuration A.
- Experimental: NoCDO, C, A, BParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration C, CDO configuration A, and finally CDO configuration B.
- Experimental: NoCDO, C, B, AParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration C, CDO configuration B, and finally CDO configuration A.
Primary Outcome Measure
PROMIS Physical Function [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Central Contacts
- Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD319-335-6857
- Molly S Pacha, MS, ATC, LAT319-290-7596
Locations (5)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naval Medical Center San Diego - Clinical Biomechanics Laboratory | San Diego | California | 92134 | Trevor Kingsbury, PhD |
| University of Iowa | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | |
| Minneapolis VA Health Care System - Motion Analysis Laboratory | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55417 | John Looft, PhD |
| Mayo Clinic - Motion Analysis Lab | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | Kenton R Kaufman, PhD |
| Vanderbilt University - Zelik Lab For Biomechanics & Assistive Technology | Nashville | Tennessee | 37212 | Karl Zelik, PhD |
Find similar trials in San Diego, CA
By research site
Naval Medical Center San Diego - Clinical Biomechanics Laboratory· San Diego, CAUniversity of Iowa· Iowa City, IAMinneapolis VA Health Care System - Motion Analysis Laboratory· Minneapolis, MNMayo Clinic - Motion Analysis Lab· Rochester, MNVanderbilt University - Zelik Lab For Biomechanics & Assistive Technology· Nashville, TN
Related Studies
- Dance Mental Health AppRecruiting · University of California, San Diego · San Diego, California