From Opinion to Evidence: Multi-site Evaluation of Custom Dynamic Orthosis Best Practices

Part of paid clinical trials in San Diego, California.

Sponsor
Jason Wilken
Study ID
NCT06352788
Status
Recruiting

Conditions

  • Foot Injury

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Modular Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO) — DEVICE
    The CDO will use a modular design that includes a full length foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee.
  • Mono Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO) — DEVICE
    The CDO will use a mono design that includes a full length foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee.

Study Details

This study is designed to support evidence-based practice and optimal care by evaluating how different configurations of two types of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) influences outcomes following traumatic lower extremity injury.

Key Dates

Start date
Jul 2, 2024
Status verified
Dec 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027
Completion
Sep 1, 2028

Study Design

Enrollment
35 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Experimental: NoCDO, A, B, C
    Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration A, CDO configuration B, and finally CDO configuration C.
  • Experimental: NoCDO, A, C, B
    Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration A, CDO configuration C, and finally CDO configuration B.
  • Experimental: NoCDO, B, A, C
    Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration B, CDO configuration A, and finally CDO configuration C.
  • Experimental: NoCDO, B, C, A
    Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration B, CDO configuration C, and finally CDO configuration A.
  • Experimental: NoCDO, C, A, B
    Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration C, CDO configuration A, and finally CDO configuration B.
  • Experimental: NoCDO, C, B, A
    Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration C, CDO configuration B, and finally CDO configuration A.

Primary Outcome Measure

PROMIS Physical Function [ Time Frame: Baseline ]

Central Contacts

Locations (5)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
Naval Medical Center San Diego - Clinical Biomechanics LaboratorySan DiegoCalifornia92134
Trevor Kingsbury, PhD
University of IowaIowa CityIowa52242
Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD
319-335-6857
Molly S Pacha, MS, ATC, LAT
319-290-7596
Minneapolis VA Health Care System - Motion Analysis LaboratoryMinneapolisMinnesota55417
John Looft, PhD
Mayo Clinic - Motion Analysis LabRochesterMinnesota55905
Kenton R Kaufman, PhD
Vanderbilt University - Zelik Lab For Biomechanics & Assistive TechnologyNashvilleTennessee37212
Karl Zelik, PhD

Find similar trials in San Diego, CA

Related Studies