Normalizing Cervical Intersegmental Kinematics With Spinal Manipulative Therapy
Part of paid clinical trials in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
- Sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Study ID
- NCT06312696
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Neck Pain
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 39 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- SMT — OTHERSMT will be provided by a licensed chiropractor with at least 5 years' experience. Treatment will last 15 to 20 minutes each and include a brief history and examination of the cervical spine. SMT will consist of low velocity, variable amplitude spinal mobilization to the cervical spine - Maitland grades 3 or 4. Spinal segments will be determined by the chiropractor using manual palpation and the patients' response to care. Drop-table or instrument-assisted SMT will not be allowed.
- Light Massage — OTHERLight Massage will be provided as a pseudo-sham intervention to control for time, attention, and touch by a licensed chiropractor with at least 5 years' experience to control for touch and is intended to be delivered gentler and shorter than recommended for therapeutic massage.
Study Details
The broad long-term objective is to develop an objective biomarker for spinal health based on aberrant or abnormal movement patterns during functional activities to better target spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) and other conservative treatments. The central hypotheses are a) that aberrant spinal motions and their location (area and level) are indicative of underlying spinal dysfunction, and b) that quantified 3D cervical spine intersegmental and global motion patterns during functional tasks can be used as a biomarker for subsequent clinical studies aimed at normalizing cervical kinematics. Specific Aim: Determine the extent to which SMT can modulate, or normalize, intersegmental motion in patients with neck pain. Rationale: SMT is a force-based biomechanical event whose hypothesized mechanism of action relies on moving the segment into the para-physiological zone, resulting in normalization of spinal kinematic function. Hypothesis: Severity of abnormal or aberrant motion, identified in those with NP, will improve following SMT. Approach: Participants with chronic mechanical neck pain will be recruited and randomized into one of three groups: 1) No Treatment, 2) Light Massage (pseudo- sham), and 3) Spinal Manipulative Therapy. Using a repeated measures study design, metrics of quality of spinal motion will be compared before and after the prescribed intervention.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Apr 1, 2024
- Status verified
- Apr 2026
- Primary completion
- Apr 1, 2027
- Completion
- Apr 1, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
Arms
- No Intervention: No treatment groupNo Treatment: participants will be placed in a similar position to the other groups for the same duration, but no treatment or touch will be administered.
- Sham Comparator: Pseudo sham groupLight massage group
- Experimental: Experimental groupSpinal Manipulative therapy group
Primary Outcome Measure
Intersegmental and Global Range of Motion [ Time Frame: 1 hr ]
Central Contacts
- Stephany Nathe
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55414 | Stephany Nathe |
Find similar trials in Minneapolis, MN
Related Studies
- The Effect of Dry Needling With Electrical Stimulation on Individuals With Restless Legs SyndromeNot Yet Recruiting · Mayo Clinic · Rochester, Minnesota
- Evaluation of the Effects of a Rehabilitation Program in Individuals with Spine PainRecruiting · SpineZone Medical Fitness, Inc · San Diego, California
- CEM-Plate and CEM-Cage First-In-Human Use Efficacy StudyRecruiting · ReVivo Medical, Corp. · Union, New Jersey
- Safety and Efficacy of Oral Cannabis in Chronic Spine PainPHASE3 · Recruiting · University of Colorado, Denver · Aurora, Colorado