Seattle Biopsy Protocol Versus Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus Undergoing Surveillance

Part of paid clinical trials in Gilbert, Arizona.

Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Study ID
NCT05530343
Status
Recruiting

Conditions

  • Barrett Esophagus
  • Barretts Esophagus With Dysplasia
  • Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - 89 Years
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Seattle protocol — DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
    Participants undergo 4-quadrant biopsies with standard biopsy forceps taken at 2 cm intervals. For participants undergoing a confirmatory endoscopy for cases in which discordant results are noted (WATS3D positive for dysplasia/cancer and Seattle biopsy negative for dysplasia/cancer), repeat biopsies will be taken at 1 cm intervals along with target biopsies from any visible lesions.
  • WATS3D brushings — DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
    Participants undergo 2 WATS3D biopsies of every 5 cm segment of Barrett's esophagus, starting from the gastroesophageal junction and moving proximally through the entire segment of Barrett's.

Study Details

The purpose of this research study is to learn about the best approach to sample patients with known or suspected Barrett's esophagus (BE) by comparing the standard Seattle biopsy protocol to sampling using wide area transepithelial sampling (WATS3D). Barrett's esophagus is a common condition that is used to spot patients at increased risk of developing a type of cancer in the esophagus (swallowing tube) called esophageal adenocarcinoma. The 5-year survival rate is as low as 18% for patients who get esophageal adenocarcinoma, but the rate may be improved if the cancer is caught in its early stages. Barrett's esophagus can lead to dysplasia, or precancerous changes, which occurs when cells look abnormal but have not developed into cancer. If the abnormal cells increase from being slightly abnormal (low-grade dysplasia), to being very abnormal (high-grade dysplasia), the risk of developing cancer (esophageal adenocarcinoma) goes up. Therefore, catching dysplasia early is very important to prevent cancer. Endoscopic surveillance is a type of procedure where endoscopists run a tube with a light and a camera on the end of it down a patients throat and remove a small piece of tissue. The piece of tissue, called a biopsy, is about the size of the tip of a ball-point pen and is checked for abnormal cells and cancer cells. Patients are being asked to be in this research study because they have been diagnosed with BE or suspected to have BE, and will need an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Patients with BE undergo sampling using the Seattle biopsy protocol during which samples are obtained from the BE in a four quadrant fashion every 2 cm along with target biopsies from any abnormal areas within the BE. Another sampling approach is WATS3D which utilizes brushings from the BE. While both of these procedures are widely accepted approaches to sampling patients with BE during endoscopy, there is not enough research to show if one is better than the other. Participants in this study will undergo sampling of the BE using both approaches (Seattle biopsy protocol and WATS-3D); the order of the techniques will be randomized. Up to 2700 participants will take part in this research. This is a multicenter study involving several academic, community and private hospitals around the country.

Key Dates

Start date
Oct 3, 2022
Status verified
Jun 2024
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2026
Completion
Mar 31, 2026

Study Design

Enrollment
2,298 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SCREENING

Arms

  • Other: Seattle protocol, then WATS3D brushings.
    Participants in the screening or surveillance population that receive the Seattle protocol, then WATS3D brushings, during the same procedure.
  • Other: WATS3D brushings, then Seattle Protocol.
    Participants in the screening or surveillance population that receive the WATS3D brushings, then the Seattle protocol, during the same procedure.

Primary Outcome Measure

Diagnostic yield of dysplasia (Surveillance population only) [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]

Central Contacts

Locations (14)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
Arizona Centers of Digestive HealthGilbertArizona85295
Mankanwal Sachdev, MD
Mankanwal Sachdev, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Virender Sharma, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterLos AngelesCalifornia90024
Raman Muthusamy, MD
310-825-1892
Venkataraman Muthusamy, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Adarsh M Thaker, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Kevin A Ghassemi, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Kaiser PermanenteOaklandCalifornia94611
Howard Chang, MD
Howard Chang, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Gene Ma, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Mitchell Liverant, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraColorado80045
Alexa DeBord, MS
303-724-0432
Sandra Boimbo, MPH
303-724-8892
Sachin Wani, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Steven Edmundowicz, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Mihir Wagh, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Paul Menard-Katcher, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Connecticut Clinical Research InstituteBristolConnecticut06010
Salam Zakko, MD
Salam Zakko, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Peter Bloom, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Liam Zakko, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Daniel Smiley, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Mark Versland, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Eddy Castillo, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
David Chaletsky, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Suncoast Endoscopy of SarasotaSarasotaFlorida34239
Scott Corbett, MD
941-320-7327
Lisa Underwood
941-952-1145
Scott Corbett, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Northwestern UniversityChicagoIllinois60611
Srinadh Komanduri, MD
312-933-4873
Justeena Jojo
312-926-4977
Srinadh Komanduri, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Mayo ClinicRochesterMinnesota55905
Prasad Iyer, MD
507-266-4338
Melissa Passe
(507) 255-8693
Prasad Iyer, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Cadman Leggett, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Chamil Codipilly, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Long Island Jewish Medical CenterNew Hyde ParkNew York11040
Molly Stewart, BS
718-470-4667
Arvind Trindade, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNew York10065
Felice Schnoll-Sussman, MD
Felice H Schnoll-Sussman, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Philip O Katz, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Amir Soumekh, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
University of RochesterRochesterNew York14642
Vivek Kaul, MD
Vivek Kaul, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Shivangi Kothari, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth Carolina27599
Nicholas Shaheen, MD
Katie Danis
(919) 843-5884
Nicholas J Shaheen, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Swathi Eluri, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Cary C Cotton, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Geisinger Medical CenterDanvillePennsylvania17822
Harshit Khara, MD
Harshit Khara, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Joshua Obuch, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)
Gastrointestinal Associates, PCKnoxvilleTennessee37909
Kathy Karnes, BSN, RN
865-558-0687
John M Haydek, MD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)
Raj I Narayani, MD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR)

Find similar trials in Gilbert, AZ

Related Studies