Randomized Trial Comparing Immediate vs. Deferred Surgery for Symptomatic ERM
Part of paid clinical trials in Scottsdale, Arizona.
- Sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
- Study ID
- NCT05145491
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Epiretinal Membrane
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 50 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Immediate Vitrectomy — PROCEDURESurgery to remove epiretinal membrane (ERM). Vitrectomy will be performed on eyes within 1 month of randomization
- Deferred Vitrectomy — PROCEDUREVitrectomy may be performed only if at least one of the following criteria is met: 1. Decrease in visual acuity ≥10 letters from baseline at a single visit presumed to be from ERM 2. Decrease in visual acuity ≥5 letters from baseline at two consecutive visits presumed to be from ERM a. Visits must be at least one month apart 3. Participant actively requests surgery due to worsening symptoms 4. Complication requires prompt surgical intervention (e.g., macular hole, retinal detachment, non-clearing vitreous hemorrhage)
Study Details
Vitrectomy to remove an epiretinal membrane (ERM) is one of the most common procedures performed by retinal surgeons. Patients who present with significant macular changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) but relatively good vision are often advised to defer surgery until vision declines to 20/40 or worse. However, it is unknown if delaying surgery, which allows the foveal architecture to remain compromised and potentially to deteriorate, results in worse visual acuity outcomes than if surgery is performed earlier. In addition, there is a need to better understand predictors of outcomes when surgery is performed and predictors of progression when surgery is deferred. Finally, one of the most common presenting symptoms from an ERM is distortion or metamorphopsia. There are several objective measures of metamorphopsia but none have ever been employed to evaluate ERMs in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and their usefulness is unknown. The purposes of this study are to better understand the optimal timing of surgery to produce the best visual result, to better understand predictors of outcomes in those who undergo surgery and predictors of progression in those whose are observed, and to better characterize and evaluate the usefulness of metamorphopsia and reading speed measures.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Feb 22, 2022
- Status verified
- Sep 2025
- Primary completion
- Dec 31, 2026
- Completion
- Dec 31, 2026
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Active Comparator: Immediate Vitrectomy
- Other: Deferred Vitrectomy
Primary Outcome Measure
Mean change in visual acuity letter score from baseline to 36 months [ Time Frame: Baseline to 36 months ]
Locations (45)
Find similar trials in Scottsdale, AZ
Related Studies
- Intraoperative OCT Guidance of Intraocular Surgery IIRecruiting · Duke University · Durham, North Carolina
- DISCOVER Study: Microscope-integrated Intraoperative OCT StudyRecruiting · The Cleveland Clinic · Cleveland, Ohio