Comparison of Synthetic Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography in Image Interpretation and Performance Metrics

Part of paid clinical trials in Houston, Texas.

Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Study ID
NCT05056818
Status
Recruiting

Conditions

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
FEMALE
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Electronic Health Record Review — OTHER
    Review of medical records and past imaging examinations

Study Details

This study compares synthetic mammography to full-field digital mammography in image interpretation and performance metrics. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has previously been found to be superior in performance to standard digital mammography in both screening and diagnostic settings for the early detection and improved diagnosis of breast cancers. DBT in combination with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) reduces recall rates and increases cancer detection rates relative to FFDM alone. Synthetic mammography is a 2-dimensional reconstructed image, using the dataset derived from the DBT acquisition, without requiring additional radiation dose. Collecting information from patients' medical records may help doctors analyze the characteristics, utility, and impact of synthetic mammography to compared to FFDM.

Key Dates

Start date
Dec 15, 2020
Status verified
Apr 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2026
Completion
Oct 31, 2026

Study Design

Enrollment
750 participants (estimated)

Arms

  • Arm: Observational (medical records)
    Patients' medical records and past imaging examinations are reviewed.

Primary Outcome Measure

To analyze the impact of synthetic mammography (SM), as compared with full-field digital mammography (FFDM [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year ]

Central Contacts

Locations (1)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
M D Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexas77030
Ray C. Mayo
713-745-4555
Ray C. Mayo (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR)

Find similar trials in Houston, TX

By condition

Related Studies