Left and Right Hemisphere Contributions to Speech Perception

Conditions

• Neural Bases of Speech Perception

Eligibility Criteria

Sex

ALL

Age

18 Years - N/A

Healthy Volunteers

Accepted

Interventions

• Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation — DEVICE
  TMS will be delivered in 10 Hz pulses for 2.5 seconds, with behavioral measures of speech perception and object categorization immediately following each pulse. TMS at this schedule is thought to temporarily disrupt activity at the stimulation site.

Study Details

Left and right temporal brain areas are thought to contribute to speech perception, but the division of labor between left and right hemisphere regions is still unclear. Here we use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to stimulate left and right temporal foci and a vertex control site to temporarily disrupt activation at the stimulation site, using a "virtual lesion" approach to test the effect of stimulation site on a series of speech perception tasks. This portion of the project is basic research. However, since TMS is viewed as an intervention, studies involving TMS in this grant are considered clinical trials.

Key Dates

Start date

Dec 19, 2024

Status verified

Dec 2024

Primary completion

Dec 31, 2025

Completion

Jun 30, 2026

Study Design

Enrollment

26 participants (estimated)

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

CROSSOVER

Primary purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Arms

• Experimental: Experiment 2. Phonetic precision disrupted by TMS
  Experiment 2 tests the influence of temporary disruption of activity within the left or right temporal cortex on the speed and precision of phonetic decisions compared to vertex stimulation. Participants will receive stimulation at all three sites (left temporal, right temporal, vertex, with order of stimulation counterbalanced across participants). Immediately following stimulation pulses, participants will perform a visual analog scale (VAS) phonetic rating task on tokens from the four continua, embedded in speech-shaped noise. To control for the possibility that TMS leads to a generalized deficit in categorization, a control task will involve categorization of visual objects on a morphed "dog" to "cat" object continuum. (We expect this task to be unaffected by TMS). The variables of interest are the steepness of the categorization curve, mean reaction time to all items on the continuum, and the difference in reaction time for boundary vs. endpoint tokens.
• Experimental: Experiment 3. Phonetic ambiguity in continuous speech
  Experiment 3 is designed to test whether left vs. right temporal lobe stimulation selectively disrupts processing of naturally-occurring phonetic ambiguity as compared to vertex stimulation (control). Participants will receive stimulation at all three sites (left temporal, right temporal, vertex, with order of stimulation counterbalanced across participants). Stimuli will be nonsense sentences produced clearly or in a casual register. By-sentence phonetic ambiguity is estimated by the proximity of each token to other vowels belonging to different categories. Sentences will be embedded in speech-shaped noise to increase difficulty. Participants will listen to each sentence, then respond whether a visually-presented probe word appeared in the sentence ("BRASS?"). Dependent variables are accuracy and reaction time on this probe verification task.
• Experimental: Experiment 6: Disruption of talker-specific phonetic learning using TMS.
  Experiment 6 is designed to test whether disruption of activity in left or right temporal regions (vs. vertex control) using TMS interferes with talker-specific learning. Participants will receive stimulation at all three sites (left temporal, right temporal, vertex, with order of stimulation counterbalanced across participants). The study uses a training paradigm where one talker's speech is manipulated to always have relatively short voice onset times (VOTs) for voiceless stops (e.g., /k/ in "coal") and another to have relatively long VOTs. Immediately after stimulation, listeners will undergo a training trial where they identify sounds as mapping to Talker 1 or Talker 2's voice, and to the word (e.g. "gain" vs. "cane"). At test, listeners hear two VOT variants and are asked which is more typical of that talker's speech. The dependent variable is the accuracy of reporting which variant is typical of the talker.

Primary Outcome Measure

Categorization accuracy [ Time Frame: Immediately following the stimulation pulses (within one second of the final pulse). ]

Locations (1)

Find similar trials in Storrs, CT