Approach-Avoidance, Computational Framework for Predicting Behavioral Therapy Outcome (AAC-BeT)
Part of paid clinical trials in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
- Sponsor
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.
- Study ID
- NCT04426461
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Anxiety
- Depression
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 65 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Behavioral Activation — BEHAVIORALBehavioral activation will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized, behavioral intervention focused on enhancing engagement in meaningful and reinforcing activities.
- Exposure-based therapy — BEHAVIORALExposure-based therapy will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized, behavioral intervention focused on decreasing avoidance to allow for inhibitory learning and challenging negative expectations.
- Supportive therapy — BEHAVIORALSupportive therapy will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized intervention focused on encouraging patients to talk openly about their thoughts, emotions, and any past or current concerns.
Study Details
Depression and anxiety disorders rank in the top ten causes of years lived with disability. Less than 50% of patients experiencing long-lasting improvements to current gold-standard treatments. Two gold-standard behavioral interventions include behavioral activation, focused on enhancing approach behavior towards meaningful activities, and exposure-based therapy, focused on decreasing avoidance and challenging negative expectations. While these interventions have divergent treatment targets, there is little knowledge to inform which strategies should be used in the frequent case of comorbid anxiety and depression. Approach-avoidance decision-making paradigms focus on assessing responses when faced with potential rewards and threats, tapping into processes important for both anxiety and depression as well as behavioral activation and exposure-based therapy. For this study, investigators will recruit individuals reporting both anxiety and depression symptoms and randomize them to one of three different interventions: (1) behavioral activation, (2) exposure-based therapy, and a non-specific therapy approach (3) supportive therapy. Participants will complete clinical, self-report, behavioral, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessments before and after therapy. Investigators will use a computational approach to model factors that may influence one's behavior during approach-avoidance decision-making, including drives to avoid threat versus approach reward and confidence versus uncertainty in one's decisions. This project will accomplish the following aims (1) Determine how changes in brain and behavior responses during approach-avoidance conflict relate to changes in mental health symptoms with the different therapy approaches, (2) Determine the degree to which baseline brain and behavior responses during approach-avoidance conflict predict response to the different therapy approaches, above and beyond the influence of demographics and baseline symptom severity. In addition, by including peripheral blood draws and measures of grace matter volume, the project will also accomplish the following aims: (1) Determine whether kynrenine metabolites measures peripherally may be beneficial as a biomarker of treatment response and (2) determine whether there is an association between change in kynurenine metabolites and changes in gray matter volume with treatment. Results will enhance understanding of how different psychotherapy approaches (behavioral activation, exposure-based therapy) may impact brain responses and decisions when faces with potential reward versus threat and approach versus avoidance drives. In addition, results will have important implications concerning the potential for a more personalized approach to psychotherapy, enhancing knowledge of which types of therapy strategies may be most beneficial for which individuals.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Sep 11, 2020
- Status verified
- Jun 2025
- Primary completion
- Jun 30, 2025
- Completion
- Jun 30, 2025
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 220 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- BASIC_SCIENCE
Arms
- Experimental: Behavioral activation
- Experimental: Exposure-based therapy
- Active Comparator: Supportive therapy
Primary Outcome Measure
Composite score from Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) [ Time Frame: Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments ]
Central Contacts
- Mallory Cannon, M.S.918-581-4885
- Robin L Aupperle, PhD918-502-5744
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laureate Institute for Brain Research | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74136 | Robin L Aupperle, PhD (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Tulsa, OK
Related Studies
- A Study to Assess Change in Disease Activity and Adverse Events (AEs) With Cariprazine in the Treatment of Depressive Episodes in Pediatric Participants Participants (10 to 17 Years of Age) With Bipolar I Disorder.PHASE3 · Recruiting · AbbVie · Bentonville, Arkansas
- IN Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric EDPHASE4 · Recruiting · University of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
- Processes and Circuitry Underlying Threat Sensitivity as a Treatment Target for Co-morbid Anxiety and DepressionPHASE4 · Recruiting · Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc. · Tulsa, Oklahoma
- Amplification of Positivity for Alcohol UseRecruiting · Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc. · Tulsa, Oklahoma