Donor Outcomes Following Hand-Assisted and Robotic Living Donor Nephrectomy: a Retrospective Review
Part of paid clinical trials in Dallas, Texas.
- Sponsor
- Methodist Health System
- Study ID
- NCT04182607
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Kidney Diseases
- Transplant
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- kidney transplant — PROCEDUREClinical data will be collected from electronic medical records (EMRs) on donors and recipients who underwent a minimally invasive kidney transplantation procedure
Study Details
1.1. Background: Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for eligible patients with end-stage renal disease. It provides better outcomes in terms of life expectancy and quality of life than dialysis (Liu, Narins, Maley, Frank, \& Lallas, 2012). Kidney transplants from living donors also have additional benefits in terms of graft function and survival compared to transplants from cadaver donors (Galvani et al., 2012). Living donor transplants provide an opportunity to have good quality grafts and to perform the procedure when the recipient is in an optimal clinical status (Creta et al., 2019). Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was first introduced in 1995 and is currently accepted as the gold standard for kidney procurement from living donors. The first worldwide robotic assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed in 2000 by Horgan et al. (Horgan et al., 2007). The main obstacle to living donation is the exposure of a healthy subject to the risks of a major surgical intervention. Therefore, efforts have been made to reduce complications and postoperative pain, achieve faster recovery, and minimize the surgical incisions. Minimally invasive procedures like hand-assisted and robotic approaches greatly enhance living donation rates, and in 2001 the number of living donors exceeded the number of cadaver donors (Horgan et al., 2007). 1.2. Aim(s)/Objective(s): The objective of this study is to compare intra- and postoperative patient outcomes of kidney donors following hand-assisted and robotic kidney transplants at a single center. 1.3. Rationale for the study: More research is needed regarding the differences between minimally invasive approaches to kidney transplantation.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Nov 6, 2019
- Status verified
- Sep 2024
- Primary completion
- Nov 30, 2025
- Completion
- Nov 30, 2025
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Arms
- Arm: hand-assisted kidney transplantKidney donors and recipients who underwent a hand-assisted kidney transplant
- Arm: robotic kidney transplantKidney donors and recipients who underwent a robotic kidney transplant
Primary Outcome Measure
Patient demographics [ Time Frame: between January 2006 and November 2019 ]
Central Contacts
- Crystee Cooper, DHEd214-947-1280
- Zaid Haddadin, MS214-947-1280
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75203 | Alejandro Mejia, MD |
Find similar trials in Dallas, TX
Related Studies
- Open-label Extension Study of Zigakibart in Adults With IgA Nephropathy.PHASE3 · Recruiting · Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Denver, Colorado
- Repository of Novel Analytes Leading to Autoimmune, Inflammatory and Diabetic Nephropathies (RENAL AID)Recruiting · The Rogosin Institute · New York, New York
- Biorepository to Support Research in Kidney DiseasesEnrolling By Invitation · Yale University · New Haven, Connecticut
- Optimizing Y90 Therapy for Radiation LobectomyRecruiting · Northwestern University · Jacksonville, Florida