Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women

Part of paid clinical trials in Los Angeles, California.

Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Study ID
NCT04124120
Status
Recruiting

Conditions

  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Heart Diseases

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
FEMALE
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Single arterial graft — PROCEDURE
    This interventions consists of patients receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. In addition to the left internal thoracic artery patients will receive venous grafts for all additional grafting.
  • Multiple arterial grafting — PROCEDURE
    This intervention consists of the patient receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. The second arterial graft (right internal thoracic artery or radial artery) will be directed to the major branch of the circumflex. Additional grafts will include saphenous veins or arterial conduits.

Study Details

The central hypothesis of ROMA:Women is that the use of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) will improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) compared to single arterial grafting (SAG). The specific aims of ROMA:Women are: Aim 1: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,300 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important clinical and surgical subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated. The women enrolled in the ongoing ROMA trial (anticipated to be approximately 690) will be included in ROMA:Women, increasing efficiency and reducing enrollment time. Hypothesis 1.0. MAG will reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Hypothesis 1.1. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups. Aim 2: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on generic and disease-specific QOL, physical and mental health symptoms in women undergoing CABG. The investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (including those enrolled in ROMA:QOL). Differences by important subgroups (as defined above) will also be evaluated. Hypothesis 2.0. MAG will improve generic and disease-specific QOL compared to SAG. Hypothesis 2.1. MAG will improve physical and mental health symptoms compared to SAG. Hypothesis 2.2. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.

Key Dates

Start date
Apr 17, 2023
Status verified
Mar 2026
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2030
Completion
Mar 31, 2030

Study Design

Enrollment
2,300 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Experimental: Single Arterial Graft (SAG) group
    Patients in this group will receive a single arterial graft which will be the left internal thoracic artery. Additional grafts used in this group will all be venous grafts.
  • Experimental: Multiple Arterial Graft (MAG) group
    Patients in the group will receive multiple arterial grafts. All patients will receive at least two arterial grafts, the left internal thoracic artery with the addition of either the right internal thoracic artery or the radial artery as the second conduit. Some patients may receive additional arterial grafts consisting of the radial artery, the right internal thoracic artery, or the right gastroepiploic artery.

Primary Outcome Measure

Primary outcome for aim 1: Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure. [ Time Frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up ]

Central Contacts

Locations (42)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCalifornia90048
Joanna Chikwe, MD
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical CenterPomonaCalifornia91767
Christine Montesa, MD
University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCalifornia94118
Elaine Tseng, MD
University of ColoradoAuroraColorado80045
Jessica Rove, MD
Hartford HospitalHartfordConnecticut06106
David Yaffee, MD
Yale University HospitalNew HavenConnecticut06510
Roland Assi, MD
Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgia30322
John Puskas, MD
University of ChicagoChicagoIllinois60637
Hasam Balkhy, MD
Indiana UniversityIndianapolisIndiana46202
Lola Chabtini, MD
University of IowaIowa CityIowa52242
Mohammad Bashir, MD
Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMaryland21218
Jennifer Lawton, MD
Baystate HealthSpringfieldMassachusetts01199
Daniel Engelman, MD
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical SchoolWorcesterMassachusetts01655-
University of MichiganAnn ArborMichigan48104
Robert Hawkins, MD
Corewell Health William Beaumont University HospitalRoyal OakMichigan48073
Thomas Schwann, MD
Washington University in St. LouisSt LouisMissouri63110
Puja Kachroo, MD
Nebraska Heart HospitalLincolnNebraska68526
Omar Nass
Methodist Physicians HealthOmahaNebraska68118
HelenMari Merritt-Genore, DO
University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraska68198
Aleem Siddique, MD
Englewood HealthEnglewoodNew Jersey07631
Molly Schultheis, MD
Newark Beth Israel Medical CenterNewarkNew Jersey07112
Arash Salemi, MD
The Valley HospitalRidgewoodNew Jersey07450
Juan B Grau, MD
NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist HospitalBrooklynNew York11215
Sandhya Balaram, MD
Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNew York10032
Koji Takeda, MD
Lenox Hill HospitalNew YorkNew York10075
Nirav Patel, MD
Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNew York10021
Mario Gaudino, Prof/PhD/MD
212-746-1812
New York Presbyterian QueensQueensNew York11355
Charles Mack, MD
Duke UniversityDurhamNorth Carolina27710
Brittany Zwischenberger, MD
East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleNorth Carolina27858
Benjamin Degner, MD
Wake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemNorth Carolina27106
Bart Imielski, MD
Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhio44195
Faisal Bakaeen, MD
Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhio43210
Jovan Bozinovski, MD
Genesis Healthcare SystemZanesvilleOhio43701
Surender Neravetla, MD
University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania19104
Marisa Cevasco, MD
Allegheny General HospitalPittsburghPennsylvania15212
Scott Halbreiner, MD
Lankenau Medical CenterWynnewoodPennsylvania19096
Gianluca Torregrossa, MD
Rhode Island HospitalProvidenceRhode Island02903
Neel Sodha, MD
Baylor Scott & White Research InstituteDallasTexas75204
Michael DiMaio, MD
The University of Texas Medical Health Branch at GalvestonGalvestonTexas77550
Andre Son, MD
Baylor College of MedicineHoustonTexas77030
Lauren Barron, MD
UT Health San AntonioSan AntonioTexas78229
Dawn Hui, MD
University of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah84132
Matthew Goodwin, MD

Find similar trials in Los Angeles, CA

Related Studies