Efficacy and Safety Study of ESBA1008 Versus EYLEA®
- Sponsor
- Alcon Research
- Study ID
- NCT01796964
- Phase
- PHASE2
- Status
- Completed
Conditions
- Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 50 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- ESBA1008 solution — DRUGFor intravitreal (IVT) injection
- Aflibercept — DRUGFor intravitreal (IVT) injection
Study Details
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ESBA1008 versus EYLEA® in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Mar 31, 2013
- Status verified
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Oct 31, 2013
- Completion
- Aug 31, 2014
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 173 participants (actual)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: ESBA1008ESBA1008 solution, 7 intravitreal (IVT) injections, as specified in protocol
- Active Comparator: EYLEAAflibercept, 8 intravitreal (IVT) injections, as specified in protocol
Primary Outcome Measure
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Change From Baseline (No. of Letters) to Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 12 ]