Induction Chemotherapy (R-CHOP Vs. R-FC) Followed by Interferon Maintenance Versus Rituximab Maintenance in MCL
- Sponsor
- European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network
- Study ID
- NCT00209209
- Phase
- PHASE3
- Status
- Unknown
Conditions
- Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 60 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Rituximab — DRUGantibody
- Cyclophosphamide — DRUGchemotherapy
- Doxorubicin — DRUGchemotherapy
- Vincristine — DRUGchemotherapy
- Prednisone — DRUGcoricosteroide
- Fludarabine — DRUGchemotherapy
- Interferon-alpha — DRUGcytokine
- pegylated formula Interferon-alpha 2b — DRUGcytokine
- chemotherapy: R-CHOP — PROCEDUREimmuno-chemotherapy
- chemotherapy: R-FC — PROCEDUREimmuno-chemotherapy
- Interferon maintenance — PROCEDUREcytokine
- Rituximab maintenance — PROCEDUREantibody
Study Details
The aim of this study is to answer the following independent questions in the treatment of mantle cell lymphomas: * Can rituximab-fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (R-FC) improve the reduction of lymphoma mass compared to rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) and so become a new standard for initial cytoreductive therapy? * Can maintenance with rituximab substitute the interferon maintenance and even improve the progression free survival in patients after successful initial cytoreductive therapy?
Key Dates
- Start date
- Jan 14, 2004
- Status verified
- Mar 2017
- Primary completion
- Dec 31, 2018
- Completion
- Dec 31, 2018
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 570 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Active Comparator: 11. randomisation: R-CHOP 2. randomisation: IFN maintenance
- Experimental: 21. randomisation: R-FC 2. randomisation: Rituximab maintnenance
Primary Outcome Measure
First randomisation: Reduction of lymphoma mass measured by the complete remission (CR) rate